ext_271351 ([identity profile] untermensch.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] flaviomatani 2008-10-12 06:49 pm (UTC)

All the parts of their arguments that they purport to be science -- those are the easiest to debunk, because they are asking for scientific reasoning and processes to be applied. That's the part that actually gets me riled: charlatans purporting to be carrying out or explaining science.

The rest is a bunch of crap that anybody in their right mind would reject.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting